The direct and indirect effects of green tax reform in Belgium. A micro-macro approach.

Carbon pricing combined with revenue recycling through lower labor income taxation achieves carbon mitigation and a decrease in distortionary labor income tax. However, due to distributional concern, there is large societal opposition towards such reforms. The burden of the carbon price is higher for low-income households due to their higher relative expenditures on carbon-intensive goods, such as heating and transport. Moreover, also indirect effects of the carbon price, e.g. job loss in the economy, are feared to additionally fall on the shoulders of those same households. In this paper we combine a micro- and macroeconomic approach to gauge the distributional direct and indirect impacts of green tax reform. A computable general equilibrium (CGE) model is used to simulate impacts on commodity prices and real wage rates for different types of labor. These impacts are fed to a microsimulation model (MSM) of incomes and expenditures, so that we can gauge the distributional impact of several scenarios in green tax reform. We build on the existing top-down literature, discuss consistency between the two models, the choice of the numéraire and the (implicit) assumption on the uprating of the tax schedule and benefit amounts. Moreover, we show the importance of allowing automatic stabilizers to play out in the computable general equilibrium model, i.e. the role of progressive income taxation and benefits. In a traditional CGE, income taxation is modelled as a (macroeconomically calibrated) proportional tax rate. Change in market incomes would not change the tax burden in such model. However, since taxation is progressive, the tax burden responds to (real) changes in market income. The MSM, with the detailed modelling of the non-linear tax-and-benefit system captures this. We propose in this paper a simple bottom-up feedback, in which we update the proportional tax rates in the CGE with the results of a first run of the MSM, as an alternative to the estimation of a parametric (macroeconomic) progressive tax-and-benefit function to be included in the CGE. Not accounting for automatic stabilizer, overestimates the revenue recycling budget available by one half. This is also relevant for fully integrated CGE-MSM models. We find that medium-skilled employees are on average net losers of the impacts on prices and labor demand. Traditional revenue recycling schemes, such as lumpsum transfers or linear labor income tax cuts cannot overturn this welfare loss for medium-skilled, while still guaranteeing progressivity of the net impacts of the reform. However, more targeted revenue recycling schemes, inspired by the existing low wage subsidies in Belgium (the work boni) are equipped to target revenue recycling towards those most hit by the impacts on the labor market. However, robustness checks show that the adequacy of such revenue recycling design depends on the labor market assumptions in the model, specifically whether the decreased demand for medium-skilled can be translated in higher involuntary unemployment in equilibrium.