Behavioural, Nutritional, and Health Effects of Food Carbon Taxes: Evidence from a QUAIDS Demand System for Pakistan
Food pricing policies are increasingly discussed as instruments to internalise environmental externalities and improve diets. The motivation is clear: animal-based foods account for a disproportionate share of food-system greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Clark et al., 2019; Poore & Nemecek, 2018), while dietary patterns high in red and processed meat are strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks (Afshin et al., 2019; Willett et al., 2019). Yet the case for food carbon taxes cannot be made on emissions alone. In low- and middle-income countries, food expenditure shares are high and nutritional adequacy is often fragile, so price shocks can have first-order welfare and nutrition consequences (FAO, 2022). Whether carbon pricing in food delivers health co-benefits, or instead worsens diet quality for vulnerable households, is fundamentally an empirical question about substitution behaviour. This paper develops a behavioural microsimulation framework that links food carbon taxation → prices → consumption substitution → protein intake → predicted CVD risk. The core behavioural engine is a Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS), estimated on household microdata from Pakistan. QUAIDS is well-suited here because it accommodates flexible Engel-curve shapes and non-linear expenditure effects (Banks et al., 1997), which matter in settings with substantial heterogeneity in food budgets and diet composition. The demand system follows the standard AIDS/QUAIDS tradition (Deaton & Muellbauer, 1980) and is estimated with demographic controls and survey weights. Food is grouped into nine aggregates that reflect both emissions and nutrition channels: cereals; red meat; poultry; fish; dairy; fruit and vegetables; beverages; processed foods; and plant-based protein (legumes/peas/beans). Prices are constructed from unit values and total expenditure is equivalised using a square-root scale. From the estimated parameters, we recover own- and cross-price elasticities and propagate policy-induced price changes through predicted budget shares and implied quantities. Nutritional outcomes focus on protein (given its policy relevance for affordability and adequacy), derived from group-specific nutrient coefficients. Health outcomes are evaluated using comparative risk assessment logic by mapping dietary changes into shifts in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, drawing on established evidence on diet–disease relationships from large-scale comparative risk assessments (Lim et al., 2012; Micha et al., 2017) and widely used dietary benchmarks for healthy and sustainable diets (Springmann et al., 2016; Tilman & Clark, 2014). We simulate three carbon-tax scenarios applied to all food: no revenue recycling, full revenue recycling via an equal per-capita lump-sum transfer, and targeted partial recycling, where 20% of revenues subsidise plant-based protein (legumes/peas/beans). The tax is calibrated at €5 per tCO₂e, consistent with low-end carbon prices observed across many existing instruments, particularly in low- and middle-income settings (World Bank, 2023). This design captures a key tension: while carbon pricing can reduce diet-related emissions, substitution toward cheaper calories or processed foods may dilute nutritional and health co-benefits (Smed et al., 2016). The partial-recycling scenario tests whether modest earmarking can redirect substitution toward lower-emission, nutritionally favourable foods relative to the pure-tax and lump-sum benchmarks. Methodologically, the paper embeds a demand system within a fiscal microsimulation framework to jointly evaluate climate, nutrition, and health outcomes, and shows how recycling design governs whether behavioural responses translate into co-benefits.
Read MoreNavigating Trade-offs in German Social Benefit Reform
The current German system of means-tested social benefits, which include citizen’s benefit, housing benefit, and supplementary child benefit, is characterized by high effective marginal tax rates, which are often higher than 90 percent across wide income brackets. As a result, even substantial increases in working hours typically yield small gains in disposable household income. These high effective marginal tax rates apply not only to citizen’s benefit, but also to the housing benefit and supplementary child benefit. Additionally, the coexistence of competing benefits – citizen’s benefit on the one hand, housing benefit and supplementary child benefit on the other – makes the social benefits system complex to navigate for those affected. For these reasons, and against the backdrop of considerable fiscal pressures, there is currently intense political and academic debate about reforming the system.
Read More: The impact of in-work conditionality of Universal Credit on benefit take-up and employment
Universal Credit (UC) is the main means-tested benefit in the UK welfare system, supporting low-income individuals and families. UC replaced multiple benefits with a single payment, while introducing strict job search requirements and in-work conditionality. Individuals who are not working and are deemed capable of work are usually required, among other things, to actively look for a job, while claimants who are working but earning below a threshold are required to take steps to increase their earnings, including looking for alternative jobs and increasing work hours. Failure to comply can result in benefit sanctions. Research shows that UC conditionality can have detrimental effects on individual well-being and mental health, while evidence of its employment effects is mixed. In this study, we jointly model the take-up behaviour and labour supply decisions through the lens of a structural random utility model. Individuals anticipate that receiving UC negatively affects their well-being, and job search requirements may reduce the utility they derive from income and leisure. As a result, they might choose not to take up UC even if they are eligible and modify their labour supply accordingly. In this paper, we compare baseline simulations with estimated parameters with counterfactual simulations where the effects of conditionality are muted/removed. This allows us to quantify the impact of conditionality on a number of outcomes of interest, including benefit take-up and employment.
Read MoreSearch and Matching in Structural Labour Supply modelling
This paper proposes a novel approach to modelling labour supply by integrating discrete-choice frameworks with search and matching frictions, effectively capturing both supply-side heterogeneity and demand-side constraints. By combining Random Utility-Random Opportunity models with a static search and matching framework, the model offers a realistic representation of involuntary unemployment and wage adjustments, addressing key limitations in the existing literature. Empirical analysis using data from selected EU countries demonstrates the model’s capability to reflect both supply and demand responses. The introduction of an in-work benefit scheme reveals substantial cross-country variation in labour supply reactions and fiscal outcomes, highlighting the critical role of demand-side adjustments in shaping policy effectiveness.
Read MoreEstimation and Simulation of RURO Labor Supply Models with Administrative Data: Re-assessing the Evidence from Belgium
This paper estimates a Random Utility Random Opportunity model of labor supply using linked Belgian administrative data . The framework allows individuals to choose among stochastic wage and hours offers, capturing both participation decisions and hours adjustments within a unified structure. By combining tax records, social security data, and demographic registers, we construct precise measures of earnings, hours, and household characteristics.
Read MoreIntroducing Retirees into Discrete Labor Choice Models - the Case of Germany
Demographic change poses profound challenges to labor markets across advanced economies. Population ageing is increasing pressure on public social security systems in many countries. These developments have intensified the policy debate on how to extend working lives and increase labor force participation at older ages. Against this background, promoting labor force participation among individuals close to or beyond statutory retirement age has gained increasing importance. In the German policy debate, one prominent example of such an approach is the “active pension” scheme (Aktivrente) recently introduced in 2026. This policy allows employed pensioners to earn additional income up to a specified monthly threshold without being subject to income taxation. While the intended goal of these measures is to encourage voluntary labor supply at older ages, their actual quantitative effects on employment and public finances remain uncertain. Traditional models in pension economics typically conceptualize retirement as a discrete and absorbing state, in which labor force participation ends entirely upon retirement. In light of changing employment biographies and policy initiatives aimed at extending working lives, this limitation has become increasingly problematic. A methodological extension of existing microsimulation models that explicitly accounts for labor supply decisions at older ages, through differentiated transition scenarios, earnings rules, or tax allowances, is therefore required to reliably assess the effects of such reforms. The paper at hand addresses this methodological challenge using Germany as a case study. It examines to what extent microsimulation approaches behavioral adjustments can be further developed to analyze policy measures that create labor supply incentives for pensioners. The paper identifies and discusses both the limits and the potential of extending existing modeling frameworks. We were able to transfer the methodology of microsimulation to the group of retirees, using a microsimulation model based on the German Socio-Economic Panel. Simulations of hypothetical reform scenarios, as well as estimated labor supply elasticities, yield plausible results that are consistent with findings on labor supply responses among the younger working-age population. We plan to advance this model such that labor supply effects of realistic reform scenarios, like the active pension, can be estimated, as well as distributional effects of such reforms. We also plan to study and estimate in further detail the labor supply elasticities of pensioners with the model.
Read MoreDistributional Effects of Distance-Based Road Pricing: A Behavioral Microsimulation Study for the Brussels-Capital Region
At the intersection of transport economics and public finance, this research contributes to the empirical literature on transport pricing as a policy tool for addressing the externalities of vehicle use. In line with recent technological developments and ongoing policy debates, it provides an ex-ante evaluation of a distance-based road pricing scheme that varies by time (peak and off-peak), location (congested and non-congested zones), and vehicle characteristics. While such systems are widely recognized as efficient, as they better align driving costs with externalities, their implementation in passenger transport remains limited. This absence is largely driven by concerns about distributional effects, highlighting the need for robust empirical evidence on equity implications as a key input for policy feasibility.
Read MoreShifting the Tax Burden from Consumption to Income in Croatia: Preserving Efficiency while Reducing Inequality
This paper analyses the distributional effects of a fiscally neutral tax reform in Croatia that shifts the tax burden from consumption to labour income, capital income, and property. Such a reform can be considered justified given the imbalances of the Croatian tax system, which is characterised by an exceptionally high share of indirect taxes and relatively low taxation of labour, capital, and property income compared to the EU average, contributing to regressivity and greater income inequality.
Read MoreTaxing Couples as Singles? A Structural Analysis of Labor Supply for Belgium
Joint taxation of married couples remains a central feature of many income tax systems, with significant implications for labor supply and household welfare. By pooling partners’ incomes into a single tax base, joint filing can create disincentives for secondary earners and generate marriage-related penalties, raising concerns about efficiency and equity. This paper studies the impact of joint taxation on the labor supply of couples in Belgium, where the personal income tax is formally individual but substantially adjusted at the household level. We estimate a Random Utility Random Opportunity (RURO) model of labor supply using rich administrative data linking tax records and demographic information. Using the FANTASI microsimulation model of the Belgian personal income tax, we perform a counterfactual analysis of a shift from joint to individual taxation.
Read MoreSelf-interest, stated preferences and the taxation of couples
A recent and growing literature studies policy preferences empirically using survey experiments. A frequent approach in welfare economics, cost-benefit-analysis and political economy is to aggregate policy preferences assuming rationality and self-interest. In this paper we compare the two approaches in a specific policy domain, the tax treatment of married couples. We explore whether political economy arguments can explain the persistence of joint taxation in Germany. First, we use a sufficient statistics approach rooted in utility-maximizing behavior. With this approach we estimate the population shares of winners and losers from a revenue-neutral reform towards individual taxation, according to material self-interest. Second, we report on a large scale survey experiment to elicit stated preferences among a representative sample of the German population. Both methods show that the tax treatment of couples in Germany is highly controversial. Based on material self-interest, the support for a reform towards individual taxation is slightly below the majority threshold. Since the race is so close, views on just taxation or on the status of marriage can actually make a difference. We find that, according to the preferences stated in the survey experiment, support for a reduction of marriage bonuses is lower than suggested by the analysis based on self-interest.
Read MoreAccounting for Labor Supply Behavior in Tax-Benefit Simulations: An Evaluation of the Luxembourg REVIS Reform
This project evaluates the labor supply and distributional effects of the 2018 reform of the Luxembourg minimum income scheme, which replaced the Guaranteed Minimum Income (RMG) with the Social Inclusion Income (REVIS). The reform was motivated by growing concerns about inactivity traps, weak coherence between income support and activation policies, rising poverty risks among children and single-parent families, and excessive administrative complexity. REVIS aims to promote social inclusion, strengthen work incentives, improve child and single-parent poverty outcomes, and simplify administration. A key innovation of the reform is the introduction of a direct income immunization mechanism, whereby 25 per cent of household income is disregarded when calculating benefit entitlements. This represents a paradigm shift away from the pre-reform system, which effectively imposed very high implicit marginal tax rates on low earnings.
Read MoreThe direct and indirect effects of green tax reform in Belgium. A micro-macro approach.
Carbon pricing combined with revenue recycling through lower labor income taxation achieves carbon mitigation and a decrease in distortionary labor income tax. However, due to distributional concern, there is large societal opposition towards such reforms. The burden of the carbon price is higher for low-income households due to their higher relative expenditures on carbon-intensive goods, such as heating and transport. Moreover, also indirect effects of the carbon price, e.g. job loss in the economy, are feared to additionally fall on the shoulders of those same households. In this paper we combine a micro- and macroeconomic approach to gauge the distributional direct and indirect impacts of green tax reform. A computable general equilibrium (CGE) model is used to simulate impacts on commodity prices and real wage rates for different types of labor. These impacts are fed to a microsimulation model (MSM) of incomes and expenditures, so that we can gauge the distributional impact of several scenarios in green tax reform. We build on the existing top-down literature, discuss consistency between the two models, the choice of the numéraire and the (implicit) assumption on the uprating of the tax schedule and benefit amounts. Moreover, we show the importance of allowing automatic stabilizers to play out in the computable general equilibrium model, i.e. the role of progressive income taxation and benefits. In a traditional CGE, income taxation is modelled as a (macroeconomically calibrated) proportional tax rate. Change in market incomes would not change the tax burden in such model. However, since taxation is progressive, the tax burden responds to (real) changes in market income. The MSM, with the detailed modelling of the non-linear tax-and-benefit system captures this. We propose in this paper a simple bottom-up feedback, in which we update the proportional tax rates in the CGE with the results of a first run of the MSM, as an alternative to the estimation of a parametric (macroeconomic) progressive tax-and-benefit function to be included in the CGE. Not accounting for automatic stabilizer, overestimates the revenue recycling budget available by one half. This is also relevant for fully integrated CGE-MSM models. We find that medium-skilled employees are on average net losers of the impacts on prices and labor demand. Traditional revenue recycling schemes, such as lumpsum transfers or linear labor income tax cuts cannot overturn this welfare loss for medium-skilled, while still guaranteeing progressivity of the net impacts of the reform. However, more targeted revenue recycling schemes, inspired by the existing low wage subsidies in Belgium (the work boni) are equipped to target revenue recycling towards those most hit by the impacts on the labor market. However, robustness checks show that the adequacy of such revenue recycling design depends on the labor market assumptions in the model, specifically whether the decreased demand for medium-skilled can be translated in higher involuntary unemployment in equilibrium.
Read MoreIntegrating Labor Demand Frictions in a Random Utility Random Opportunity Labor Supply Model
This paper studies labor market responses to tax policy using a structural labor supply model estimated within a Random Utility - Random Opportunity framework. The RURO model represents labor supply as a choice among a finite set of work options, where individuals compare the utility of different employment and hours combinations given the opportunities available to them. Preferences are modeled in a random utility framework, while heterogeneity in job availability and constraints is captured through the opportunity structure. This allows the model to account for both choice behavior and limitations in feasible options. We combine this structural labor supply framework with a detailed microsimulation model based on Belgian administrative data, allowing for an accurate mapping from labor supply choices to disposable income and fiscal outcomes.
Read MoreBimic+: microsimulation with labor supply
This paper introduces BIMic+, the labor supply extension of the tax and benefit microsimulation model of the Bank of Italy, BIMic (Curci, Savegnago and Cioffi, 2017). The model follows the Random Utility approach (McFadden, 1974; Aaberge, Dagsvik, and StrØm,1995; Van Soest, 1995). The model focuses on the labor supply behavior of wage earners and imputes wages for workers who are not employed through a two-step Heckman estimation procedure. The utility function departs from the quadratic functional form, which is common in this literature, to avoid decreasing utility in disposable income, a violation of a critical assumption in consumer theory and that underlies all redistributive analyses and is crucial for computing equivalent variations. The main arguments of the utility function are hours and disposable income. The latter is calculated through the static module, BIMic, for each counterfactual hours option. With respect to the literature, we innovate by: (i) matching the observed distribution of hours as a constraint into the optimization problem to avoid overfitting issues (as opposed to the usual approach of drawing taste shocks until the estimated hours match the observed ones). We do so in a way that also matches the distribution of labor income from aggregated tax returns. (ii) organizing the output of the model according to a strand of the public finance literature theoretically connected to optimal taxation. For each policy, we want to characterize the willingness to pay of beneficiaries and the net government cost, taking into account behavioral responses to the policy. We also propose to use these quantities to compute the marginal value of spending public funds in such a policy (Hendren and Sprung-Keyser, 2020; Bourguignon and Landais, 2022). In the last section of our paper, we simulate the labor supply effects of a policy reform as an illustration of how to use our model and its output; specifically, we focus on a cut in social security contribution for mothers with at least two children introduced in Italy in 2024.
Read More
Introduction to EUROLAB
With the B2 Fiscal Policy Analysis Unit in Sevilla, we developed a User Interface to our labour supply model that is integrated with EUROMOD. The model is going to be publicly available in end of Q1 2026. I could give a tutorial on:
Read More