Pensions

Home /
Tags /
Pensions

Alternatives for financing social security in Luxembourg by resident and cross-border households

Given the rapidly evolving structural socio-demographic determinants in Luxembourg (ageing, migrations, cross-border households) and social needs induced, the concern about the funding of the Luxembourg social security system is high on the agenda. This concern could become even more pressing over time, given Luxembourgs specificity in several respects. According to the 2024 Ageing Report of the EPC’s Ageing Working Group, Luxembourg might face an increase of age-related expenditure from 17.2% of GDP in 2022 to 27.9% in 2070, mostly due to pensions (+ 8.3% of GDP over the period). This is the biggest increase expected in EU-countries, a first particularity for Luxembourg. A second specificity is the importance of cross-border commuters in the Luxembourg economy. These represent 43% of total employment in 2022. Given such a context, the countrys social players are looking for avenues of reflection for future concrete proposals. This paper precisely aims to contribute to such a debate. It examines day-after impact of hypothetical parametric changes in social contributions and personal income taxes (the “alternatives”) on the distribution of household disposable income and total public financial receipts from these sources for Luxembourg. Moreover and given the importance of cross-border commuters for the country, we need a microsimulation modelling EUROMOD-based covering both residents and cross-border commuters’ households, the latter population involving an essential innovative extension to previous assessments. We emphasize the structural discrepancies between residents and cross-border households in terms of socio-economic status as well as regarding gross labor and taxable income. Consequently, we show that total receipts from residents are greater than those from cross-border households, even when controlling for population size. Next, we examine 42 alternatives based on the concerns of a key Luxembourg social partner in the context of an ongoing public debate. This examination takes into account the values achieved for a triplet of standard indicators chosen for their simplicity and acceptability to a broad public, and this within the framework of an independent external expertise : total revenues (cross-border households included), the inequality Gini coefficient and the poverty rate (the latter two for the resident population only). We then complete our detailed overview with an evaluation of each alternative according to the selected dimensions altogether. Finally, we evoke a basic “Global Performance Index” which may enlighten conclusions derived from a one or two-dimensional analysis. Although the analysis is specific to Luxembourg, the policy alternatives and methodology considered here may also be relevant for other countries with comparable socio-economic fundamentals, particularly in the context of the EU-wide concern regarding the fiscal implications of population ageing.

Comparative Pension Microsimulation using microWELT: Lessons from Benchmarking to a Detailed National Model

Comparative pension microsimulation supports coherent cross-country policy analysis by us-ing harmonised inputs such as EU-SILC. Yet institutional heterogeneity and limited life-course information in standardised surveys constrain how credibly national rules, accrual mecha-nisms, and retirement pathways can be represented within a portable framework. Portability is feasible, but for most countries the feasibility frontier is set by what can be inferred from harmonised data and how much institutional detail can be included without sacrificing com-parability. We explore the validity domain of comparative modelling by benchmarking a comparative model against a detailed national model in a controlled “sister-model” setting. Our compar-ative model is microWELT, designed for multi-country applications and therefore built around portable representations of labour-market and retirement transitions and simplified pension benefit calculations. Retirement timing follows parsimonious rules centred on statutory ages, and benefits are approximated via mappings from pre-retirement earnings. microWELT is pa-rameterised for eight European countries and serves as a uniform base for refining national applications. We compare microWELT to microDEMS, a closely related detailed Austrian model built on longitudinal administrative data. microDEMS reconstructs employment and insurance careers and implements Austrian pension law at a granular level, including path-way-specific eligibility and benefit calculations that depend on accumulated insurance peri-ods and full contribution histories. This pairing allows us to attribute projection differences directly to data richness and institutional detail - rather than to unrelated modelling choices. Empirically, we use Austria’s reform harmonising women’s statutory retirement age with men’s as a demanding test case. Although the reform is simple to describe, it is difficult to capture with stylised comparative rules because it is phased in over time and interacts with multiple exit routes from the labour market whose availability depends on career histories. We run matched baseline and reform scenarios focussing on retirement transitions over the next decade under harmonised demographic and macro assumptions and compare age- and cohort-specific retirement and employment profiles as well as the timing of pension claiming and aggregate expenditure trajectories.

From Marital Entitlements to Individual Risks: Vertical Solidarity and the Future of Survivors’ Pensions in Beveridgean Systems

Survivors’ pensions have long served as a central pillar of social protection in Beveridgean pension systems, offering intrafamilial insurance against the economic consequences of widowhood. Yet demographic ageing, evolving family structures, and gendered labour‑market patterns increasingly call into question the appropriateness and sustainability of marital-status‑based entitlements. Drawing on recent European jurisprudence and ongoing reform debates in Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Japan, the project examines how the abolition or redesign of survivors’ pensions would affect vertical solidarity in a Beveridgean first‑pillar pension system. Using the Swiss Old‑Age and Survivors’ Insurance (OASI) as an illustrative case, the analysis explores how interpersonal redistribution, intrafamilial solidarity, and spousal equalisation mechanisms jointly shape pension outcomes across marital statuses and along the pension‑income distribution. The study employs MIDAS‑CH, a dynamic microsimulation model calibrated to Swiss SILC data, to generate long‑term counterfactual life‑course trajectories under shifting gender labour‑market behaviours. This enables an assessment of how redistribution embedded in the Swiss first pillar—minimum and maximum pensions, care credits, splitting rules, and survivor benefits—operates in a context where men’s and women’s participation, hours, and wages converge. As family structures diversify and dual-earner households become the norm, traditional justifications for marital entitlements weaken, suggesting that solidarity mechanisms may need to shift from status-based to individualised forms. To identify the redistribution channels at work, the project applies a Recentered Influence Function (RIF) decomposition, which separates differences in characteristics (earnings histories, contribution years, care credits) from differences in coefficients, interpreted as the redistributive valuation embedded in the benefit formula. This distinction allows a distribution‑sensitive quantification of vertical solidarity and an assessment of how strongly various institutional components compensate gendered labour‑market inequalities. The RIF approach provides insight into nonlinear redistribution at the bottom, middle, and top of the pension distribution—precisely where floors, ceilings, credit valuation, and splitting rules bite. Simulation results show that survivors’ benefits play a meaningful but declining role in equalising outcomes, particularly as women accumulate stronger contributory records. Removing survivor pensions lowers intrafamilial solidarity but increases the relative importance of interpersonal redistribution, especially for low‑income individuals. When labour‑market participation, work intensity, and wages between men and women are equalised, women’s pensions rise markedly, while men’s decline modestly. Consequently, the gender pension gap narrows substantially through improved earnings capacity rather than through marital entitlements. In scenarios of full labour‑market convergence, marital-status‑based mechanisms—splitting, capping, and survivors’ benefits—become less central, while individualised solidarity instruments such as minimum pensions and care credits remain decisive. These findings highlight a fundamental shift in the organisation of solidarity within Beveridgean pension systems. As gender labour‑market trajectories converge and family forms diversify, the rationale for marital entitlements weakens, and the effectiveness of solidarity increasingly depends on individualised, needs‑based instruments rather than derived rights. Vertical solidarity remains essential for cushioning fragmented careers and low earnings, but its incidence evolves as women’s labour‑market attachment strengthens. In this environment, survivor protection can be better targeted through time‑limited or earnings‑tested supplements, while care credits and progressive benefit formulas remain central to mitigating gendere

Introducing Retirees into Discrete Labor Choice Models - the Case of Germany

Demographic change poses profound challenges to labor markets across advanced economies. Population ageing is increasing pressure on public social security systems in many countries. These developments have intensified the policy debate on how to extend working lives and increase labor force participation at older ages. Against this background, promoting labor force participation among individuals close to or beyond statutory retirement age has gained increasing importance. In the German policy debate, one prominent example of such an approach is the “active pension” scheme (Aktivrente) recently introduced in 2026. This policy allows employed pensioners to earn additional income up to a specified monthly threshold without being subject to income taxation. While the intended goal of these measures is to encourage voluntary labor supply at older ages, their actual quantitative effects on employment and public finances remain uncertain. Traditional models in pension economics typically conceptualize retirement as a discrete and absorbing state, in which labor force participation ends entirely upon retirement. In light of changing employment biographies and policy initiatives aimed at extending working lives, this limitation has become increasingly problematic. A methodological extension of existing microsimulation models that explicitly accounts for labor supply decisions at older ages, through differentiated transition scenarios, earnings rules, or tax allowances, is therefore required to reliably assess the effects of such reforms. The paper at hand addresses this methodological challenge using Germany as a case study. It examines to what extent microsimulation approaches behavioral adjustments can be further developed to analyze policy measures that create labor supply incentives for pensioners. The paper identifies and discusses both the limits and the potential of extending existing modeling frameworks. We were able to transfer the methodology of microsimulation to the group of retirees, using a microsimulation model based on the German Socio-Economic Panel. Simulations of hypothetical reform scenarios, as well as estimated labor supply elasticities, yield plausible results that are consistent with findings on labor supply responses among the younger working-age population. We plan to advance this model such that labor supply effects of realistic reform scenarios, like the active pension, can be estimated, as well as distributional effects of such reforms. We also plan to study and estimate in further detail the labor supply elasticities of pensioners with the model.

MIDAS DE – A LIAM2 based dynamic microsimulation of German pension incomes using linked RV–SOEP data

We introduce MIDAS DE, a LIAM2 based microsimulation model for analysing German pension incomes under current law and counterfactual policy scenarios. The model reproduces the statutory formula for earnings point accrual, access and type factors, and the current pension value, and is designed to evaluate distributional, gender, and adequacy effects of reforms such as pension splitting and survivor benefit adjustments within a unified framework. MIDAS DE is implemented in LIAM2 using discrete time processes over entities (individuals, households), typed fields (e.g., insured status, pension points), and explicit links (spouse/partner, parent–child) necessary for survivor pensions and splitting eligibility. The model combines SOEP RV administrative insurance records with SOEP survey microdata. Linkage relies on rv_id (SOEP RV↔SOEP) and pid to reconstruct households and partnerships from ppath/ppathl, household matrices from pbrutto/pl, and family histories from biofam/biomars. This enables (i) identification of spouses; (ii) retrieval of pension relevant histories for groups under represented in DRV (e.g., civil servants, self employed) via biowork/biojob; and (iii) construction of household attributes needed for survivor benefit means tests. To harmonise labour income for accrual, we estimate gender and occupation specific Heckman selection models for three groups—salaried employees, self employed, and civil servants—ensuring segment specific participation mechanisms and wage processes. Predictions are selection corrected (inverse Mills ratio) and back transformed with lognormal adjustments; observed wages replace predictions when available. This captures institutional heterogeneity (e.g., civil service pay scales, self employment volatility) and mitigates bias from missing or misreported earnings, feeding consistent contributory bases into earnings point calculations. Robustness checks consider exclusion restrictions (household composition and partner status), outlier trimming, and alternative retransformation (smearing). Technically, MIDAS DE shows how LIAM2 can host a law consistent German pension engine calibrated on linked RV–SOEP microdata with explicit household links, enabling faithful simulation of survivor pensions, pension splitting, and income offsets. Substantively, the model structures policy scenarios along current law splitting, VersAusglG style variants (with and without 25 year conditions and cross pillar coverage), and a universal splitting regime, providing outcomes on the gender pension gap, poverty at retirement, and fiscal effects.

Modelling France’s Agirc-Arrco supplementary pension scheme

Modelling France’s Agirc-Arrco supplementary pension scheme. The Agirc-Arrco federation runs a pension scheme complementary to France’s first pillar CNAV Old-Age pension scheme. This compulsory pay-as-you-go point system is second only to the CNAV by its size. It covers most private sector wage-earners, with 27 million contributors over a given year, and represents on average a third of pension income paid to 14 million pensioners. It is run together by trade unions and employer organisations. They determine most regulatory aspects of the scheme, such as contribution rates or the point’s buying price. Most notably, they set the annual revision of the point value to guarantee Agirc-Arrco’s reserve funds are at least equivalent to 6 months of benefits for the next 15 years. To cover this and other projection needs, the Agirc-Arrco technical department developed a microsimulation model in native Python to project the system’s future income and expenditure at an individual level until 2070 through a range of economic, demographic and regulatory hypotheses. Using a random sample of more than 2 million contributors, retirees and survivor pensioners, it models affiliation to the Agirc-Arrco scheme, labour-market transitions, wages, mortality and retirement decisions. It computes individual contributions, points bought during individual careers, and retirement and survivor pensions consequently paid by Agirc-Arrcos pension system. It is thus a key input for Agirc-Arrco’s decision makers, to ensure the scheme’s sustainability goals are met. It also provides periodic insights regarding the system’s joint management by social partners and is used for aggregate projections of the French pension system coordinated by the Retirement Orientation Council (COR). This presentation provides an overview of Agirc-Arrcos microsimulation model main features and graphical results, shedding light on France’s second most important pension scheme and sharing methodological choices of interest to the microsimulation community,